Secondary math students taught by Teaching Fellows teachers had test scores similar to peers taught by traditional-route teachers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students of secondary math teachers from Teaching Fellows programs had test scores similar to students of teachers from traditional routes. → Melissa Clark 2013
Evidence¶
Melissa Clark 2013¶
Melissa Clark, Sheena McConnell, Jill Constantine, Hanley Chiang. (2013). Addressing Teacher Shortages in Disadvantaged Schools: Lessons from Two Institute of Education Sciences Studies. NCEE Evaluation Brief, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
q3 · i? · causal · r?
IES evaluation study comparing secondary math student test scores for Teaching Fellows teachers against traditional-route teachers, as summarized in the brief, which reports similar scores with no printed effect size or test statistic.
"as did students of secondary math teachers from Teaching Fellows programs"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Elementary students taught by teachers from less selective alternative routes had test scores similar to peers taught by traditional-route teachers — related
- Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers — related
- Secondary math students taught by Teach For America teachers outperformed peers taught by traditional-route teachers by 0.06 standard deviations — related
- The findings contradict claims that alternative teacher preparation programs such as Teach For America harm students — related
- A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement — related
- Secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs are as effective as teachers receiving traditional certification — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- In some cases, Teach For America and Teaching Fellows secondary math teachers are more effective than traditionally certified math teachers — related
- Alternative routes to teaching were promoted in the past decade because of concerns about teacher shortages and teacher quality — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teaching-fellows-secondary-math-similar-traditional |
title |
Secondary math students taught by Teaching Fellows teachers had test scores similar to peers taught by traditional-route teachers |
description |
Secondary math students taught by Teaching Fellows teachers had test scores similar to peers taught by traditional-route teachers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — melissa-clark-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.