Claims

Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-08 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a random assignment study, students placed with an alternatively certified teacher showed no statistically significant difference in reading or math achievement compared with students whose teacher came through the traditional route. → Jill Constantine 2009

Evidence

Jill Constantine 2009

Jill Constantine, Daniel Player, Tim Silva, Kristin Hallgren, Mary Grider, John Deke. (2009). An Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mathematica's random assignment study of alternative routes to teacher certification tracked 2,600 students in 63 schools in 20 medium and large school districts in 7 states during the 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 school years. The study "found no statistically significant difference in reading or math achievement" between the two teacher routes.

"Researchers found no statistically significant difference in reading or math achievement for students placed in a classroom with traditionally or alternatively certified teachers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id alt-cert-teachers-no-worse-student-achievement
title Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers
description Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
source_checked 2026-10-08
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jill-constantine-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.