Team regulation affected group learning results in one condition (Saab et al.)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Saab et al. found in one condition that team regulation affected the learning results of the group in collaborative inquiry learning. → Nadira Saab 2012

Evidence¶

Nadira Saab 2012¶

Nadira Saab. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports, attributing to Saab et al., that "in one condition that team regulation affected the learning results of the group" in a physics collaborative inquiry learning study examining the influence of different kinds of support. No effect sizes are printed in the editorial.

"Saab et al. found in one condition that team regulation affected the learning results of the group."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Team regulation correlates positively with learning results only in the CHT condition — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Regulation at the dyadic and/or group level is positively related to group performance in CSCL — a broader claim this one bears on
• Regulation of social activities positively affected group performance (Janssen et al.) — related