Claims

Teaching technique and personal traits interacted significantly in their effect on descriptive-writing achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There is a significant interaction between teaching techniques (Roundtable vs Clustering) and personal traits (introvert vs extrovert) on descriptive-writing achievement (Fobs = 6,58 > Ftable = 3,97). → Sinaga 2017

Evidence

Sinaga 2017

Megawati Sinaga. (2017). The Effect of Roundtable and Clustering Teaching Techniques and Students' Personal Traits on Students' Achievement in Descriptive Writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.69

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The two-way ANOVA of the 2x2 factorial design tested the interaction of the teaching-technique and personal-trait factors on writing achievement; the article reports "Fobs =6,58 > Ftable =3.97", exceeding the 0.05 criterion, and Table 3.2 labels the interaction row Significant.

"there is interaction between teaching techniques and personal traits on students' achievement in descriptive writing with Fobs =6,58 > Ftable =3.97"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.