Claims

Brain-based learning delivered with technology outperformed conventional teaching on the immediate post-test in application level and overall achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a quasi-experimental study of grade eight science students, the technological experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the application level and overall performance of the immediate post-test. → Al-Balushi 2018

Evidence

Al-Balushi 2018

Al-Balushi, K. A., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2018). Effectiveness of Brain-Based Learning for Grade Eight Students’ Direct and Postponed Retention in Science. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11336a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental study of 197 grade-eight students in six randomly assigned classes; MANCOVA on post-test scores showed significant differences in the application level (f=3.86) and overall performance (f=4.25), with LSD comparisons favouring the technological group, described as "in favour of the technological group".

"The ad -hoc LSD analysis reveals that the only significant differences were between the technolog ical and control groups in both the application level and the overall performance in the post -test (in favour of the technological group)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.