Announcing an upcoming test did not significantly change learning from the participation film¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1953 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Warning groups that a test would follow the film did not produce significantly different learning than not warning them. → Michael 1953
Evidence¶
Michael 1953¶
Michael, D. N. (1953). Some Factors Influencing the Effects of Audience Participation on Learning from a Factual Film. Memo Report No. 13A, Human Resources Research Laboratories, Bolling Air Force Base. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Michael+audience+participation+factual+film
q2 · i? · causal · r1
In the film experiment, half the groups were told they would have a test after the film, intended to raise motivation. The review reports that "Warning that a test would follow did not produce significantly different learning." No effect size is printed; equivalence was not tested.
"Warning that a test would follow did not produce significantly different learning."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Knowledge of the correct response was the most important single factor in learning from audience-participation film segments — related
- In Study 2, both general and specific warnings at least marginally reduce attitude change, with no significant difference between them — related
- The AI-fallibility warning did not significantly change error rate or time spent per problem-solving step — related
- A warning message about potential AI mistakes increases seventh-graders' hint requests in a math intelligent tutoring system — related
- No significant difference in learning between overt (observable) and covert (mental) practice during film participation — related
- Modified film commentaries were consistently superior to the original commentary although differences were not statistically significant at a high level of confidence — related
- A second showing of an educational film produced substantial learning increments, but a third showing failed to add materially or significantly — related
- Every group of college freshmen learned significantly from each educational film as measured by pre-test to post-test gains — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
test-announcement-no-learning-effect |
title |
Announcing an upcoming test did not significantly change learning from the participation film |
description |
Announcing an upcoming test did not significantly change learning from the participation film |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1953 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — michael-1953 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.