Text production significantly improves retention at all four intervals for 30–40-year-old GFL learners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Two-way ANOVA showed significant influence on retention of 30–40-year-old subjects in all four time intervals, with the strongest effect on short-term retention (η2 = .46). → Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani 2018

Evidence¶

Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani 2018¶

Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani. (2018). On the Efficiency of Text Production in Vocabulary Learning: An Empirical Study on Iranian GFL-Learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p176

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Two-way ANOVA (2 with/without text production × 2 age group) for the 30–40-year age group (CG n = 8, EC n = 5); the article reports "F (1, 10) = 8.69, p = .015" with η2 = .46 for short-term retention and significant effects at the other intervals.

"A significant influence is noticeable on the short-term retention performance (F (1, 10) = 8.69, p = .015 (p ≤ 0.01), η2 = .46), as well as on the medium-term retention performance (F (1, 10) = 6.02, p = .034 (p ≤ 0.05), η2 = .38)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Age has no significant effect on retention performance for learners aged 20–30 — related
• Gender moderates the retention benefit of text production: significant for female learners at 24 hours only, not for male learners — related
• Text production in text-oriented vocabulary exercises improves short-term (30-minute) retention of new GFL vocabulary — related
• Text production does not significantly improve long-term retention of new GFL vocabulary after one week or three weeks — reports the opposite
• Text production improves medium-term (24-hour) retention of new GFL vocabulary — related