Claims

Text production improves medium-term (24-hour) retention of new GFL vocabulary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Learners who learned words in a text-oriented manner showed significantly better retention 24 hours after the learning phase than the control group. → Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani 2018

Evidence

Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani 2018

Nader Haghani & Samira Kiani. (2018). On the Efficiency of Text Production in Vocabulary Learning: An Empirical Study on Iranian GFL-Learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p176

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Second control test 24 hours after learning, analyzed with an independent samples t-test between the experimental group (n = 28) and control group (n = 25); the article reports "t (51) = -2.72, p = .009" as significant.

"higher values (M = 10.28, SD = 3.15) were found in the EC (n = 28) than in the CG (n = 25, M = 7.64, SD = 3.91). The independent samples t-test showed a significant difference between the groups (t (51) = -2.72, p = .009"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.