Claims

The programme appeared more effective when coaches were highly trained, enthusiastic and committed and when secondary schools worked closely with feeder primaries

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Implementation quality moderated programme effectiveness: highly trained, enthusiastic and committed coaches, and close coordination between secondary schools and feeder primaries, were associated with greater effectiveness. → Maxwell 2014

Evidence

Maxwell 2014

Maxwell, B., Connolly, P., Demack, S., O'Hare, L., Stevens, A., & Clague, L. (2014). TextNow Transition Programme: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581131

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Process evaluation combining online surveys of coordinators (primary 64%, secondary 68% response) and coaches, plus four pupil focus groups with 22 intervention pupils, analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis; findings are the evaluators' interpretive conclusions about implementation, not a tested causal comparison.

"The programme appeared to be more effective when secondary schools worked closely with feeder primaries to co-ordinate all elements of the programme. In addition, more effective coaches were highly trained , enthusiastic and committed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.