Prior experimental studies of TFA consistently showed a positive, statistically significant effect on student math achievement but no discernable effect on reading¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The review reports that experimental studies of TFA consistently produced a positive and statistically significant effect on student math achievement, while finding no discernable effect on reading achievement. → Turner H 2018
Evidence¶
Turner H 2018¶
Turner H, Ncube M, Turner A, Boruch R, Ibekwe N. (2018). What are the effects of Teach For America on Math, English Language Arts, and Science outcomes of K–12 students in the USA? Campbell Systematic Reviews 2018:7. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.7
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Narrative synthesis in the review's background section: the review attributes this pattern to prior experimental studies (citing Clark et al., 2013; Decker, Mayer, & Glazerman, 2004; and others), reporting "a positive and statistically significant effect of TFA on student math achievement". Quasi-experimental studies produced mixed signals.
"In contrast, the experimental studies have consistently produced a positive and statistically significant effect of TFA on student math achievement, though they found no discernable effect on reading achievement"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TFA teachers have positive effects on mathematics achievement for students in grades pre-K-12, based on six studies — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- TFA teachers show no discernible effects on English language arts achievement for students in grades pre-K-12 — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- TFA teachers in their first two years of teaching are more effective than more experienced non-TFA teachers in the same schools — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers — related
- Students of certified teachers outperformed students of under-certified teachers, including TFA teachers, on all three SAT-9 subtests in low-income districts — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tfa-experimental-studies-positive-math-no-reading-effect |
title |
Prior experimental studies of TFA consistently showed a positive, statistically significant effect on student math achievement but no discernable effect on reading |
description |
Prior experimental studies of TFA consistently showed a positive, statistically significant effect on student math achievement but no discernable effect on reading |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — turner-h-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.