Students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly differently from students of other under-certified teachers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2002 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly different from students of other under-certified teachers; equivalence was not tested. → tfa-null-1
Evidence¶
Laczko-Kerr 2002¶
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, September 6). The Effectiveness of "Teach for America" and Other Under-certified Teachers on Student Academic Achievement: A Case of Harmful Public Policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Matched-pair comparison in which one subset of the 109 under-certified teachers was from Teach For America. The study reports no statistically significant difference between TFA and other under-certified teachers' students; no effect size or test statistic is printed, so equivalence was not established.
"Results indicate 1) that students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly different from students of other under-certified teachers, and 2) that students of certified teachers out-performed students of teachers who were under-certified."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students of certified teachers outperformed students of under-certified teachers, including TFA teachers, on all three SAT-9 subtests in low-income districts — related
- A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement — reports the opposite
- Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers — related
- TFA teachers have positive effects on mathematics achievement for students in grades pre-K-12, based on six studies — reports the opposite
- In some cases, Teach For America and Teaching Fellows secondary math teachers are more effective than traditionally certified math teachers — reports the opposite
- An elementary-school RCT found no statistically significant difference between TFA and non-TFA teachers in mathematics or reading achievement — related
- TFA shows a small positive effect on reading for early elementary students (PreK to grade 2) but not in math — related
- Secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs are as effective as teachers receiving traditional certification — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tfa-no-different-other-undercertified |
title |
Students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly differently from students of other under-certified teachers |
description |
Students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly differently from students of other under-certified teachers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laczko-kerr-2002 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.