Claims

TGT produced significant positive shifts on two of sixteen mathematics-attitude statements in the experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Paired t-tests found significant pretest-posttest differences only on Value statement 02 and Enjoyment statement 04 (both p < .05), leading H02 to be rejected. → Abdus Salam 2015 q2 i? On Value 02, experimental-group means rose from 2.65 at pretest to 4.61 at posttest; on the negative Enjoyment 04 statement, means fell from 4.67 to 2.43. → Abdus Salam 2015 (2)

Evidence

Abdus Salam 2015

Abdus Salam, Anwar Hossain, & Shahidur Rahman. (2015). Effects of using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) Cooperative Technique for Learning Mathematics in Secondary Schools of Bangladesh. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085938

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-tests on the 16-statement attitude inventory for the 46-student experimental group; "two pairs had significant difference in their Mean Difference," under the Value and Enjoyment factors, both p < .05.

"Data in Table 3 indicate that two pairs had significant difference in their Mean Difference."

Abdus Salam 2015 (2)

Abdus Salam, Anwar Hossain, & Shahidur Rahman. (2015). Effects of using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) Cooperative Technique for Learning Mathematics in Secondary Schools of Bangladesh. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085938

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Conclusion-section descriptive report of the two significant attitude items: "participants scored a Mean of 2.65 on Value 02 variable but after the treatment it increased to 4.61"; Enjoyment 04 fell from 4.67 to 2.43. Descriptive means only.

"On the pretest participants scored a Mean of 2.65 on Value 02 variable but after the treatment it increased to 4.61."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.