Students' attitudes towards error-handling cluster into three characteristic learner types¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A cluster analysis of pre-questionnaire attitude scales identified three types of learners with distinct profiles of attitudes towards error-handling. → Rach 2013
Evidence¶
Rach 2013¶
Rach, S., Ufer, S., & Heinze, A. (2013). Learning from errors: effects of teachers’ training on students’ attitudes towards and their individual use of errors. PNA, 8(1), 21-30. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/27879
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Ward-method cluster analysis on the four pre-questionnaire scales (TSaff, TScog, NF, IU) identified three student types (Figure 2 reports N = 272, N = 257, N = 169).
"We could identify three types of learners with respect to their attitude s towards error-handling (Figure 2), two types showing relatively high response low ratings on all scales and one type reporting some teacher support, little fear of errors, but also little use of errors as learning opportunities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Intervention effects on error attitudes do not differ across the three student attitude types — related
- Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
- Students' motivation in physical education combines into three distinct profiles: self-determined, non self-determined, and moderate levels of both types — related
- Four distinct GenAI chatbot adoption personas emerge: Cautious Achievers, Skeptical Utilitarians, Disengaged Doubters, and Engaged Enthusiasts — related
- Cluster analysis of instructors identifies three user groups that differ in several AI literacy dimensions, with the ethics scale providing a clear distinction — related
- Cluster analysis of consumption behaviour and attitude identified four consumption groups among the eighth graders — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.