Claims

Across all three inquiry levels, the experimental group's critical and creative thinking gains exceeded the control group's gains

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The increase in critical and creative abilities was higher in the experimental group than in the control group across plant morphology, ecology, and physiology learning. → Muskita 2020

Evidence

Muskita 2020

Muskita, M., Subali, B., & Djukri. (2020). Effects of Worksheets Base the Levels of Inquiry in Improving Critical and Creative Thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13236a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' synthesis of the three Mann-Whitney analyses in the Discussion; the article reports Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.00 for the pre-test to post-test comparison and concludes the three-level inquiry worksheets were significantly effective.

"there is an increase in the critical and creative abilities of the experimental group higher than the increase in the control group in learning."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.