Claims

Open inquiry-based worksheets in plant physiology produce significantly higher post-test critical and creative thinking scores than conventional worksheets

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-class students using open inquiry worksheets scored significantly higher on post-test critical and creative thinking than the conventional control class (post-test Asymp. Sig. .000 for both aspects). → Muskita 2020

Evidence

Muskita 2020

Muskita, M., Subali, B., & Djukri. (2020). Effects of Worksheets Base the Levels of Inquiry in Improving Critical and Creative Thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13236a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment comparing open inquiry and conventional classes; post-test Mann-Whitney Asymp. Sig. was .000 for critical and creative aspects (pre-test .582 and .70). Experimental post-test means were 79 (critical) and 82 (creative) versus 56 and 54 in the control class.

"Thus it shows that the average critical and creative thinking ability of students from the posttest results by using worksheets based on open inquiry and conventional learning there are differences and are higher than those using conventional learning."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.