Claims

Structured inquiry-based worksheets in plant morphology produce significantly higher post-test critical and creative thinking scores than conventional worksheets

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-class students using structured inquiry worksheets scored significantly higher on post-test critical and creative thinking than the conventional control class (Asymp. Sig. .000). → Muskita 2020

Evidence

Muskita 2020

Muskita, M., Subali, B., & Djukri. (2020). Effects of Worksheets Base the Levels of Inquiry in Improving Critical and Creative Thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13236a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 40 experimental and 40 control students; Mann-Whitney U post-test Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) was .000 for both critical and creative aspects, versus .510 at pre-test. Experimental post-test means were 76 (critical) and 77 (creative) versus 53 and 54 in the "control class".

"Thus it shows that the average critical and creative thinking abilities of students from the post-test results using structured inquiry and conventional learning worksheets are different and higher than those using conventional learning."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.