The TIP and educational games groups were equivalent in prior literacy knowledge at pre-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A pre-test t-test found no statistically significant difference between the TIP group and the educational games group in prior literacy knowledge. → Gahwaji 2016

Evidence¶

Gahwaji 2016¶

Gahwaji, N. (2016). The Effects Of Two Different Instructional Programmes On Literacy Skills Of Kindergarten Children. Journal of International Education Research, 12(1). https://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JIER

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pre-test administration of the literacy skill assessment to both groups: TIP group M=11.619 (SD=3.154), games group M=11.550 (SD=2.929); the t-test showed "a lack of statistical significant different" at a=0.05. Equivalence was established, not tested for equivalence margins.

"As a result of the t-test, it was found that there is a lack of statistical significant different at the level of significance (a=0.05) as the calculated value for the “t” was 0.073."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Educational games instruction produced significantly higher literacy skill assessment scores than TIP instruction among Saudi kindergarten children after eight weeks — related
• No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
• Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
• High and low CT groups showed comparable prior coding knowledge before the AICA intervention — related
• U-learning and E-learning groups were statistically equivalent at pretest before the intervention — related
• The two groups did not differ significantly in prior agricultural science knowledge before the treatment — related