U-learning and E-learning groups were statistically equivalent at pretest before the intervention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pretest diagnostic scores were similar for both groups and the difference was not significant (t=-1.66, p>.05). → Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017
Evidence¶
Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017¶
Cristian Velandia-Mesa, Francisca-José Serrano-Pastor, María-José Martínez-Segura. (2017). Formative Research in Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments in Higher Education. Comunicar, 51, XXV. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-01
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Baseline comparison in the quasi-experiment with non-equivalent groups (pretest means xp=38.83, σ=7 versus xp=40.55, σ=7.25). The article reports no significant pretest difference; initial equivalence was not guaranteed because assignment was by enrollment.
"significant differences are not observed between the two groups prior to being exposed to both experimental situations (t=-1.66; p>.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the referencing stage of formative research — related
- The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in programming knowledge at pretest — related
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
- Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on religious-concepts pretest before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
- The TIP and educational games groups were equivalent in prior literacy knowledge at pre-test — related
- The three groups were statistically equivalent in transformational geometry achievement before instruction — related
- The music and non-music groups did not differ significantly on the mathematics achievement pretest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.