Claims

U-learning and E-learning groups were statistically equivalent at pretest before the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pretest diagnostic scores were similar for both groups and the difference was not significant (t=-1.66, p>.05). → Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017

Evidence

Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017

Cristian Velandia-Mesa, Francisca-José Serrano-Pastor, María-José Martínez-Segura. (2017). Formative Research in Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments in Higher Education. Comunicar, 51, XXV. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-01

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Baseline comparison in the quasi-experiment with non-equivalent groups (pretest means xp=38.83, σ=7 versus xp=40.55, σ=7.25). The article reports no significant pretest difference; initial equivalence was not guaranteed because assignment was by enrollment.

"significant differences are not observed between the two groups prior to being exposed to both experimental situations (t=-1.66; p>.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.