Claims

TLTS showed no detectable effect on science achievement after two years

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q4
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? After two years, TLTS had no detectable effect on student achievement in science (0.03 standard deviations, p = 0.266). → Naihobe Gonzalez 2023

Evidence

Naihobe Gonzalez 2023

Naihobe Gonzalez, Marykate Zukiewicz, Alicia Demers, Francisco Yang, Daniel Welsh. (2023). Evaluation of TNTP's Turnaround Leadership Teams Strategy, 2018–2022. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/evaluation-of-tntps-turnaround-leadership-teams-strategy-2018-2022

q4 · i? · causal · r?

In the same RCT, the science outcome was not a focus of TLTS supports. The report states "no detectable effect on student achievement in science (0.03 standard deviations, p-value = 0.266)"; equivalence was not tested.

"After two years, TLTS had no detectable effect on student achievement in science (0.03 standard deviations, p-value = 0.266)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tlts-no-detectable-science-effect
title TLTS showed no detectable effect on science achievement after two years
description TLTS showed no detectable effect on science achievement after two years
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — naihobe-gonzalez-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.