Claims

TOEFL-materials instruction did not change learners' views toward TBLT

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After TOEFL-materials instruction, the TI group's views toward TBLT remained significantly different from teachers' views, indicating the treatment did not affect the TI group's views. → Ali Panahi 2012

Evidence

Ali Panahi 2012

Ali Panahi. (2012). Binding Task-Based Language Teaching and Task-Based Language Testing: A Survey into EFL Teachers and Learners' Views of Task-Based Approach. English Language Teaching, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p148

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-treatment t-test (Table 8) comparing teachers' (n = 32, mean 18.94) and TI group's (n = 235, mean 8.76) TBLT views; the study reports the TOEFL-materials treatment did not affect the TI group's views toward TBLT.

"no significant difference (P> 0.23; Mean: 18.94 and 8. 76) was observed, indicating the fact that our treatment did not affect the view of TI group towards TBLT."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id toefl-instruction-no-view-change
title TOEFL-materials instruction did not change learners' views toward TBLT
description TOEFL-materials instruction did not change learners' views toward TBLT
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ali-panahi-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.