Claims

Theory of Mind is negatively correlated with DSE/social vulnerability scores on both task formats

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Fallon 2018: no comparison group (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-29)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Strange Stories ToM performance correlated negatively with DSE on both the paper-pencil task (r = -.439) and the computer role-play task (r = -.379). → Fallon 2018

Evidence

Fallon 2018

Fallon, T. L., Aylett, R., Minnis, H. and Rajendran, G. (2018). Investigating social vulnerability in children using computer mediated role-play. Computers and Education, 125, pp. 458-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.027

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pearson correlations in the Results section of the same 54-child study: "r = -.439" (p < 0.001) for paper pencil and "r = -.379" (p = 0.003) for computer role-play. The authors treat this as validating the measure.

"Theory of Mind was negatively correlated to both DSE tasks with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = -.439 and a significance value of < 0.001 for the paper pencil task and Pearson correlation coefficient of r = -.379 and p = 0.003 for the computer mediated role-play task."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.