Across participants, RAPM scores correlate positively with Certainty but not with Intuition or Suddenness¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 The RAPM score correlated reliably only with Certainty, r = .328. → Adam Chuderski 2021

Evidence¶

Adam Chuderski 2021¶

Adam Chuderski, Jan Jastrzębski, Bartłomiej Kroczek, Hanna Kucwaj, Michał Ociepka. (2021). Metacognitive experience on Raven’s matrices versus insight problems. Metacognition and Learning 16:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6

q3 · i2 · associational · r2

Bayesian Pearson correlations across the 100 participants between RAPM scores and average ratings. Only Certainty correlated reliably (r = .328, BF10 = 30.55); links with Intuition, Suddenness, and solution time were not reliable, each r < .15, each BF10 < 0.35.

"Across 100 participants, the RAPM score correlated reliably only with Certainty,r = .328, BF10 = 30.55."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Correct RAPM solutions yield higher Suddenness and Certainty and lower Intuition than incorrect solutions, with a Certainty-by-difficulty interaction — related
• Intuition ratings are unaffected by RAPM item difficulty, indicating stable strategy across items — related
• Pleasure and Certainty ratings are strongly inter-correlated, questioning the independence of the subjective-experience dimensions — related
• Suddenness and Certainty ratings decrease as RAPM item difficulty increases, with Certainty showing a strong effect — related
• The four-dimensional subjective-experience ratings are validated against classic insight and analytic problems, with Intuition and Suddenness differentiating the problem categories — related
• Mean solution time almost perfectly predicts item-level Suddenness and Certainty, and fast performance signals easy items while deliberation signals hard ones — related
• Subjective experience on the easiest RAPM items matches that of insight problems, while difficult items resemble analytic problems — related