Claims

Approximately 80% of voluntary TPS-group students expressed positive opinions of the strategy, citing improved understanding, participation, confidence and attitude

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? About 80% of the 14 voluntary essay respondents held positive opinions while 20% held negative opinions about TPS instruction. → Gok 2018

Evidence

Gok 2018

Gok, T. (2018). The evaluation of conceptual learning and epistemological beliefs on physics learning by think-pair-share. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(1), 69-80. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170940

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative essays from 14 of 35 voluntary experimental-group students, coded by the researcher as positive or negative; positive opinions focused on verbs such as "think, understand, like, enjoy, enhance, improve" and negative opinions on adjectives such as "redundant, time-consuming, nonsense".

"The majority of the students (approximately 80%) had positive opinions while 20% of the students held a negative opinion."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.