Claims

Traditional reading instruction without attention to learning styles yields non-significant gains in reading comprehension and self-efficacy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's reading comprehension post-test scores increased relative to pre-test, but not statistically significantly. → Özgül Balcı 2017

Evidence

Özgül Balcı 2017

Özgül Balcı. (2017). The Effects of Learning-Style Based Activities on Students' Reading Comprehension Skills and Self-Efficacy Perceptions in English Foreign Language Classes. Higher Education Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n4p35

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of control-group pre- and post-test scores in the quasi-experiment; the control group received routine teacher-centered instruction without attention to learning styles. No effect size is printed, so the increase is reported as untested for significance.

"The Reading Comprehension post-test scores showed an increase in the control group when compared to pre-test scores, though not statistically significant."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.