Traditional reading instruction without attention to learning styles yields non-significant gains in reading comprehension and self-efficacy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The control group's reading comprehension post-test scores increased relative to pre-test, but not statistically significantly. → Özgül Balcı 2017
Evidence¶
Özgül Balcı 2017¶
Özgül Balcı. (2017). The Effects of Learning-Style Based Activities on Students' Reading Comprehension Skills and Self-Efficacy Perceptions in English Foreign Language Classes. Higher Education Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n4p35
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison of control-group pre- and post-test scores in the quasi-experiment; the control group received routine teacher-centered instruction without attention to learning styles. No effect size is printed, so the increase is reported as untested for significance.
"The Reading Comprehension post-test scores showed an increase in the control group when compared to pre-test scores, though not statistically significant."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Reading and Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Learning-style based reading activities produce higher English self-efficacy than traditional reading activities in EFL freshmen classes — related
- Traditional reading comprehension instruction produced no statistically significant pre-test to post-test improvement in the control group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Telegram-group instruction yields significantly larger reading comprehension gain scores than traditional classroom instruction, with a printed effect size of .50 — related
- Explicit instruction of four reading comprehension strategies with short stories yields higher reading comprehension post-test scores than regular syllabus instruction in EFL preparatory students — related
- Students taught reading comprehension with Joint Productive Activity scored higher on post-tests than students taught by the traditional method — related
- Instruction through Telegram groups produces significantly higher intermediate EFL reading comprehension post-test scores than traditional classroom instruction — related
- Portfolio-based instruction improves EFL learners' reading comprehension scores relative to non-portfolio instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.