Trained teams are more likely than untrained teams to discuss summative evaluation decisions about solutions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Trained teams (43.1%) were more likely than untrained teams (25.3%) to discuss summative evaluation decisions (retaining, revising, or terminating the solution and/or precisely-defined problem). → Todd 2019
Evidence¶
Todd 2019¶
Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Preston, A. I., Cusumano, D., & Algozzine, K. (2019). A Descriptive Study of School-Based Problem-Solving. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617733717
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison of summative evaluation discussions for old problems in the 38-team wait-list controlled study. The printed test is χ2 = 6.744, df = 1, p = .009, with 43.1% of trained versus 25.3% of untrained teams discussing summative decisions; no effect size printed.
"Summative evaluation decisions (e.g., retaining, revising, or terminating the solution and/or precisely-defined problem) were discussed during 69 of the old problems. Trained teams (43.1%) were more likely (χ 2 = 6.744, df = 1, p = .009) to discuss summative evaluation decisions than untrained teams (25.3%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TIPS-trained school teams define problems with greater precision (who, what, where, when, why) than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams are more likely to report that solutions improved student behavior to goal, while untrained teams more often report worse or unclear status — related
- Trained teams use more reward elements and fewer system-change elements, and fewer solution steps overall, than untrained teams — related
- School teams frequently fail to measure whether solutions were implemented or effective before TIPS training, and 15.9% of developed solutions were never implemented — related
- After TIPS professional development, teams were more likely to define problems with precision, set implementation goals, and document implementation integrity and summative evaluation decisions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.