Trained teams use more reward elements and fewer system-change elements, and fewer solution steps overall, than untrained teams¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Trained teams included more reward solution elements (17.6% vs 11.1%) and fewer system elements (45.8% vs 73.3%) than untrained teams, and used fewer solution elements per problem (2.73 vs 6.22). → Todd 2019
Evidence¶
Todd 2019¶
Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Preston, A. I., Cusumano, D., & Algozzine, K. (2019). A Descriptive Study of School-Based Problem-Solving. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617733717
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison of solution elements across old and new problems for trained versus untrained teams (Table 4). Untrained teams had 56 solution elements within nine problems; trained teams had 153 elements within 56 problems, equating to 6.22 versus 2.73 elements per problem as printed. The authors' interpretation that alignment with precise problem statements explains the difference is offered, not tested.
"Untrained teams used more than twice the number of solution steps for their problems as did trained teams. This suggests that trained teams may have aligned their solutions with precision problem statements and not required as many solution steps to meet the desired goal (and solve the problem)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TIPS-trained school teams define problems with greater precision (who, what, where, when, why) than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams specify intended goal changes and timelines far more often than untrained teams (95.8% and 96.8% vs 4.2% and 3.2%) — related
- Trained teams more often include timelines and implementation-integrity details (what, when, who) in solution action plans than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams are more likely than untrained teams to discuss summative evaluation decisions about solutions — related
- Trained teams are more likely to report that solutions improved student behavior to goal, while untrained teams more often report worse or unclear status — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.