After TIPS professional development, teams were more likely to define problems with precision, set implementation goals, and document implementation integrity and summative evaluation decisions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q4·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i3 Following TIPS professional development, problems were more likely to be defined with precision and developed with implementation goals. → Horner 2018
q4 i2 Problems were more likely to have solution implementation integrity and summative evaluation decisions documented after training. → Horner 2018
Evidence¶
Horner 2018¶
Horner, R. H., Newton, J. S., Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Algozzine, K., Cusumano, D., & Preston, A. (2018). A Randomized Waitlist Controlled Analysis of Team-Initiated Problem Solving Professional Development and Use. Behavioral Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917745638
q4 · i3 · causal · r2
Nonparametric analyses of DORA-II records from 196 documented problems across four observations. The article reports Cramér's V effect sizes including "V = .48" for precision and "V = .68" for implementation goals.
"following the TIPS professional development, problems were more likely to (a) be defined with precision (χ2 = 13.18, p = .001, V = .48), (b) be developed with implementation goals (χ 2 = 23.46, p = .001, V = .68)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TIPS professional development produces immediate and continuing improvements in school teams' overall problem-solving practices — related
- TIPS-trained school teams define problems with greater precision (who, what, where, when, why) than untrained teams — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Trained teams are more likely than untrained teams to discuss summative evaluation decisions about solutions — related
- Trained teams more often include timelines and implementation-integrity details (what, when, who) in solution action plans than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams specify intended goal changes and timelines far more often than untrained teams (95.8% and 96.8% vs 4.2% and 3.2%) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.