Claims

Iranian translation students are not successful in comprehending interlanguage pragmatic features prior to instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the pre-test of interpretation of audio files containing ILP features, participants did not have a reasonable performance, supporting the hypothesis that translation students are not successful in comprehending pragmatic features. → Ravesh and Tabrizi 2017

Evidence

Ravesh and Tabrizi 2017

Mahnaz Mahmoudi Ravesh, Hossein Heidari Tabrizi. (2017). The Effect of Teaching Interlanguage Pragmatics on Interpretation Ability of Iranian Translation Students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 8(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.44

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t test on pre-test checklist scores of both groups (means 20.13 treatment, 19.53 control) showed no significant difference; the article concludes participants did not have a reasonable performance on the pre-test. No effect size is printed.

"According to Table 5, the value Sig. = 0.483 (p > 0.05) indicates that, in the pre-test, the groups' performances were not different because no significant difference was seen."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.