The treatment-by-gender interaction on post-test achievement is not significant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The 2-way Treatment x Gender interaction on post-test scores was not significant (F = 0.637, Sig 0.594). → Fakolade 2010

Evidence¶

Fakolade 2010¶

Fakolade, O. A. & Adeniyi, S. A. (2010). Efficacy of Enrichment Triad and Self-Direct Models on Academic Achievement of Gifted Students in Selected Secondary Schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Special Education, Vol 25 No 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ890561

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Omnibus ANCOVA table row for the Treatment x Gender interaction in the 3x2 factorial quasi-experiment: Sum of Squares 28.348, df 3, Mean Square 9.449, F 0.637, Sig 0.594 — not significant at 0.05. No effect size is printed.

"Treatment* x Gender 28.348 3 9.449 0,637 0.594"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Male and female experimental and control students were homogeneous in reading comprehension before the treatment — related
• Gender was a statistically significant source of variance in passive-voice post-test achievement — related
• Collaborative joint reading through a teacher's blog produces significantly larger reading comprehension gains than individual reading of the same stories on paper — related
• No statistically significant interaction between gender and teaching strategy on acquiring religious concepts — related
• Gender had no significant main or interaction effect on post-test scores — related