Claims

Many teachers' knowledge of students' GC and CoV increased in sophistication over the school year, and teachers reported the professional learning and just-in-time supports were helpful

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In post-interviews teachers were more attentive to how students described relationships between variables and to connections among data, graphs, and claims, rather than variable identification or generic graph descriptions. → McElhaney 2025 q2 i? Teachers reported that just-in-time experiences (mid-year PL workshop, pre-enactment check-in meetings) were helpful to their teaching. → McElhaney 2025 (2)

Evidence

McElhaney 2025

McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Thematic analysis of pre- and post-year teacher interviews about hypothetical student work found shifts in teachers' perceptions of students' GC and CoV: "teachers were more attentive in the post-interview to the ways that students described relationships between variables."

"teachers were more attentive in the post-interview to the ways that students described relationships between variables and less attentive to whether students merely identified variables as dependent or independent."

McElhaney 2025 (2)

McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d. doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-PL questionnaires, interviews, and written reflections indicated teachers valued learning connections across GC, CoV, and science content, discussing pedagogy, and the Data Routine, and "reported in interviews and written reflections that the just-in-time experiences (mid-year PL workshop, pre-enactment check-in meetings) were helpful."

"Teachers also reported in interviews and written reflections that the just-in-time experiences (mid-year PL workshop, pre-enactment check-in meetings) were helpful."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-knowledge-and-pl-supports-grew
title Many teachers' knowledge of students' GC and CoV increased in sophistication over the school year, and teachers reported the professional learning and just-in-time supports were helpful
description Many teachers' knowledge of students' GC and CoV increased in sophistication over the school year, and teachers reported the professional learning and just-in-time supports were helpful
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mcelhaney-2025, mcelhaney-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.