Claims

Schools perceived Tutor Trust tuition as most effective when tutors had strong pedagogical skills, subject knowledge, and could engage pupils and target sessions appropriately

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? School staff perceived tutor quality, especially pedagogical skill and subject knowledge, as greatly influencing the programme's impact. → Emily Buchanan 2015

Evidence

Emily Buchanan 2015

Emily Buchanan, Jack Worth, Helen Aston. (2015). Tutor Trust Primary: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581540

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative process evaluation interviews with 13 senior leaders, 7 classroom teachers, 37 tutored pupils and 10 tutors across six primary and five secondary schools. Staff were described as believing "the quality of tutors greatly influenced the impact of the programme".

"Tuition was perceived to be most effective when tutors possessed strong pedagogical skills and subject knowledge, and were able to engage and interact successfully with pupils and target sessions appropriately."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.