Pupils receiving Tutor Trust tuition made marginally less progress in English and mathematics than matched comparison pupils, with differences not statistically significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Participating pupils made marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group in English and mathematics, and the differences were not statistically significant. → Emily Buchanan 2015
Evidence¶
Emily Buchanan 2015¶
Emily Buchanan, Jack Worth, Helen Aston. (2015). Tutor Trust Primary: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581540
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental evaluation comparing tutored pupils with propensity-weighted comparison pupils from the same secondary-school cohorts using weighted linear regression. The report's results table prints effect sizes of -0.08 (English, all pupils) and -0.04 (maths, all pupils), described as "marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group".
"On average, participating pupils, including those eligible for free school meals, made marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group. However, the differences in outcomes were not statistically significant, meaning that they could have occurred by chance."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Socioeconomic Status — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Participating schools were positive about the tuition and keen to work with the Tutor Trust again, and staff saw a need for more affordable high-quality tuition — related
- Delivering the Tutor Trust programme cost approximately £185 per pupil, based on groups of three pupils receiving 25 tuition sessions — related
- Schools perceived Tutor Trust tuition as most effective when tutors had strong pedagogical skills, subject knowledge, and could engage pupils and target sessions appropriately — related
- One year after tutoring, full-sample Air Tutors participation shows no statistically significant impact on statewide math assessment scores — related
- Year 11 pupils receiving Tutor Trust English tuition achieved lower English GCSE scores than comparison pupils (effect size −0.16), but this difference cannot be attributed to the tuition — related
- Year 11 pupils receiving Tutor Trust mathematics tuition achieved slightly higher mathematics GCSE scores than comparison pupils, but this difference cannot be attributed to the tuition — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.