Claims

Pupils receiving Tutor Trust tuition made marginally less progress in English and mathematics than matched comparison pupils, with differences not statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participating pupils made marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group in English and mathematics, and the differences were not statistically significant. → Emily Buchanan 2015

Evidence

Emily Buchanan 2015

Emily Buchanan, Jack Worth, Helen Aston. (2015). Tutor Trust Primary: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581540

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental evaluation comparing tutored pupils with propensity-weighted comparison pupils from the same secondary-school cohorts using weighted linear regression. The report's results table prints effect sizes of -0.08 (English, all pupils) and -0.04 (maths, all pupils), described as "marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group".

"On average, participating pupils, including those eligible for free school meals, made marginally less progress than pupils in the comparison group. However, the differences in outcomes were not statistically significant, meaning that they could have occurred by chance."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.