One biology test showed televised instruction significantly more effective than conventional instruction, with effects uniform across ability groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1959 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In one biology test, television instruction was significantly more effective than conventional instruction and the effect was uniform for all ability groups. → Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes 1959
Evidence¶
Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes 1959¶
Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes, Presley D., Jr. (1959). Report of Three Experiments in the Use of Television in Instruction, 1958-59; Television Research in the Teaching-Learning Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02713451
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Cincinnati Public Schools experiment comparing four biology classes taught by television versus conventional instruction. The abstract reports the test result verbatim: "significantly more effective than conventional instruction and was uniform for all ability groups."
"One biology test showed television instruction to be significantly more effective than conventional instruction and was uniform for all ability groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A Facts About Science Test showed no significant differences between instruction types or ability levels, but below-average pupils preferred televised biology while above-average pupils preferred conventional instruction — related
- Almost 90 percent of comparisons between television and conventional instruction showed no substantial differences in achievement or information gain — reports the opposite
- In sixth-grade science, conventional instruction appeared better for average and below-average pupils — reports the opposite
- In telecast mathematics, high-ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while average-ability pupils did better watching television — related
- Televised Navy indoctrination instruction produced no differences in achievement scores compared with conventional instruction — related
- In the 1957-58 national television-in-schools experiment, more control-versus-experimental comparisons favored television than favored control classes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Televised lecture instruction produced no significant achievement-test differences versus traditional campus sections in a psychology and a biology course — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tv-biology-test-significantly-more-effective |
title |
One biology test showed televised instruction significantly more effective than conventional instruction, with effects uniform across ability groups |
description |
One biology test showed televised instruction significantly more effective than conventional instruction, with effects uniform across ability groups |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1959 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cincinnati-public-schools-holmes-1959 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.