In telecast mathematics, high-ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while average-ability pupils did better watching television¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 1959 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? High ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while average-ability pupils did better watching television. → Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes 1959
Evidence¶
Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes 1959¶
Cincinnati Public Schools; Holmes, Presley D., Jr. (1959). Report of Three Experiments in the Use of Television in Instruction, 1958-59; Television Research in the Teaching-Learning Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02713451
q2 · i? · causal · r?
In the seventh-grade telecast mathematics study, an ability-by-instruction pattern is reported: "high ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while those with average ability did better watching television."
"high ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while those with average ability did better watching television."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- A Facts About Science Test showed no significant differences between instruction types or ability levels, but below-average pupils preferred televised biology while above-average pupils preferred conventional instruction — related
- One biology test showed televised instruction significantly more effective than conventional instruction, with effects uniform across ability groups — related
- In sixth-grade science, conventional instruction appeared better for average and below-average pupils — reports the opposite
- Almost 90 percent of comparisons between television and conventional instruction showed no substantial differences in achievement or information gain — a broader claim this one bears on
- A full year of telecast seventh-grade mathematics did not produce pupil achievement gains reflecting teachers' inservice growth — related
- Televised Navy indoctrination instruction produced no differences in achievement scores compared with conventional instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tv-math-ability-interaction |
title |
In telecast mathematics, high-ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while average-ability pupils did better watching television |
description |
In telecast mathematics, high-ability pupils did better with conventional instruction while average-ability pupils did better watching television |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1959 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cincinnati-public-schools-holmes-1959 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.