Students of under-certified teachers made about 20% less academic growth per year than students of regularly certified teachers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2002 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students of under-certified teachers make about 20% less academic growth per year than students of teachers with regular certification. → growth-1
Evidence¶
Laczko-Kerr 2002¶
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, September 6). The Effectiveness of "Teach for America" and Other Under-certified Teachers on Student Academic Achievement: A Case of Harmful Public Policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/
q2 · i? · causal · r?
From the same matched-pair study of 109 teacher pairs in five low-income Arizona districts, comparing annual academic growth of students of under-certified versus regularly certified teachers. The printed magnitude is a percentage of growth per year, not a standardized effect size, so no standardized impact is coded.
"Students of under-certified teachers make about 20% less academic growth per year than do students of teachers with regular certification."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers — reports the opposite
- Teachers who are not fully certified have higher turnover than fully certified teachers (20.1% vs. 14.7%), with a larger gap among early-career teachers — related
- Alternatively certified teachers are 25% more likely to leave their schools and the profession, controlling for other factors — related
- First- and second-year teachers' students gain roughly 20 percent of a standard deviation less than students of more experienced teachers
- Alternative and traditionally certified teachers were similar on academic credentials but differed in race, education major, concurrent coursework, and first-year mentoring — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
undercertified-20-percent-less-growth |
title |
Students of under-certified teachers made about 20% less academic growth per year than students of regularly certified teachers |
description |
Students of under-certified teachers made about 20% less academic growth per year than students of regularly certified teachers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laczko-kerr-2002 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.