Simulation training for ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia most often shows significant improvement at Kirkpatrick level 2 outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Most studies showed statistically significant improvements in Kirkpatrick level 2 (knowledge and skills) outcomes following simulation training. → Sekhavati P 2025
Evidence¶
Sekhavati P 2025¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q3 · i? · review · r3
Systematic review of 62 studies of ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation training; the review's narrative synthesis reports that "most studies showed statistically significant improvements in Kirkpatrick level 2 outcomes".
"Similarly, in our investigation, most studies showed statistically significant improvements in Kirkpatrick level 2 outcomes."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Evidence on transfer to clinical behavior and patient outcomes is scarce: only 2 studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3 and 1 reached level 4 — related
- Simulation-based training enhances outcomes across multiple Kirkpatrick levels in neuraxial space access education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.