For ultrasound-guided venous access procedures, comparative studies show no agreement on whether distance or traditional teaching is more effective¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Studies comparing teaching of ultrasound-guided vascular access found conflicting results: one favored video lessons, one favored traditional teaching, and one found equivalence. → Duarte ML 2022

Evidence¶

Duarte ML 2022¶

Duarte ML, dos Santos LR, Iared W, Peccin MS. (2022). Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. São Paulo Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.1047.R.19052022

q3 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of three procedure-teaching studies in the review: Bertran et al. found video-lesson residents obtained better results for central venous catheter positioning; Lian et al. found the traditional method significantly better for vascular access; Chenkin et al. found web tutorial and in-person lecture equivalent.

"Regarding studies on ultrasound-guided procedures, there was no agreement among the results."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A one-hour web-based e-learning program was equally efficient as a one-hour traditional classroom lecture for USG-PVC training — related
• Student satisfaction with telemedicine ultrasound teaching is similar to traditional teaching, and distance formats are widely accepted by students — related
• Telemedicine-based teaching of ultrasonography produces results similar to traditional methods in most comparative studies, except for venous access procedures where studies disagree — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)