Incorporating video review feedback into leadership training had a positive effect on emergency medicine residents' team-leader performance in a pilot study¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Kava et al.'s randomised controlled pilot (20 patients) found a positive effect of incorporating video review feedback into leadership training for EM residents compared with self-reflection alone. → Alexander Emily G 2023
Evidence¶
Alexander Emily G 2023¶
Alexander Emily G, Denny Fraser, Gordon Malcom WG, McKiernan Cieran, Lowe David J. (2023). Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review. BMC Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
Prospective randomised controlled pilot study in which postgraduate year 2 and 3 residents acted as team leader, with the intervention group reviewing performance before a second attempt using the CALM tool; the review reports a "Positive effect of incorporating video review feedback". Gain scores were the outcome measure.
"Positive effect of incorporating video review feedback into leadership training for EM"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The CALM tool showed only weak inter-rater agreement (weighted Kappa 0.45) in its single ED video-review study — related
- Video review improves resident behaviours in clinical practice (Kirkpatrick level 3), including leadership, prescribing accuracy and communication — a broader claim this one bears on
- Introducing a designated nursing team leader was associated with lower cognitive load for the medical team leader and improved objective performance in the CANLEAD trial — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.