Claims

Incorporating video review feedback into leadership training had a positive effect on emergency medicine residents' team-leader performance in a pilot study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Kava et al.'s randomised controlled pilot (20 patients) found a positive effect of incorporating video review feedback into leadership training for EM residents compared with self-reflection alone. → Alexander Emily G 2023

Evidence

Alexander Emily G 2023

Alexander Emily G, Denny Fraser, Gordon Malcom WG, McKiernan Cieran, Lowe David J. (2023). Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review. BMC Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Prospective randomised controlled pilot study in which postgraduate year 2 and 3 residents acted as team leader, with the intervention group reviewing performance before a second attempt using the CALM tool; the review reports a "Positive effect of incorporating video review feedback". Gain scores were the outcome measure.

"Positive effect of incorporating video review feedback into leadership training for EM"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.