Claims

Video review improves resident behaviours in clinical practice (Kirkpatrick level 3), including leadership, prescribing accuracy and communication

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Six studies reported behaviour change after video review, including improved leadership scores, decreased prescribing errors and improved communication ratings. → Robbrecht M 2025

Evidence

Robbrecht M 2025

Robbrecht M, Van Winckel M, Mulder A, Embo M. (2025). What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review's level 3 synthesis reports six studies on behaviour change. For example, Parker et al.'s study "reveal[ed] a significant decrease of errors post-video review"; Kava et al. found the video review group exhibited improved leadership scores in a second resuscitation whereas the control group did not; Birnbach et al. found consistently positive significant score improvements in the video review group.

"Parker et al. [35] measured medication prescribing errors in the period before and after video feedback and self-assessment sessions with surgical residents, revealing a significant decrease of errors post-video review."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.