Claims

Video review of resident performance in clinical PGME settings shows positive learning effects, with 8 of 11 studies reporting significant results

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Video review in clinical PGME settings is associated with positive learning effects at Kirkpatrick levels 2–4, with 8 of 11 included studies reporting significant results. → Robbrecht M 2025

Evidence

Robbrecht M 2025

Robbrecht M, Van Winckel M, Mulder A, Embo M. (2025). What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of 11 studies (4 RCTs, 7 single-group pretest–posttest) of video review in clinical PGME settings. The review's narrative synthesis reports "positive learning effects associated with video review, with 8 studies reporting significant results" across Kirkpatrick levels 2 to 4. No pooled effect size was calculated due to heterogeneity.

"The results indicate positive learning effects associated with video review, with 8 studies reporting significant results [10, 30–32, 35–38]. Positive effects are reported for levels 2 to 4 of Kirkpatrick’s model for evaluation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.