Claims

An audio-visual intervention program produces significantly higher post-test language development, listening comprehension and vocabulary in preschool children than no treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Preschool children exposed to the audio-visual intervention program scored significantly higher than control children on listening comprehension, vocabulary and language development total at post-test (t = 12.69, 16.41 and 16.42, significant beyond 0.01). → Roul 2014

Evidence

Roul 2014

Sushanta Kumar Roul. (2014). Language Development of the Preschool Children: The Effects of an Audio-Visual Intervention Program in Delhi. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085265

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-test comparison of an experimental group (mean 100.50 on language development total) and control group (mean 54.16), each of 50 children from one Delhi preschool, using the investigator-developed Language Development Test. The t-ratios were "12.69, 16.41 and 16.42" for listening comprehension, vocabulary and total.

"The t-ratio between the groups comes out to be 12.69, 16.41 and 16.42. It is significant beyond 0.01 as well as 0.05 level of significance. It indicates that the preschool children of the two groups differ significantly on language development in general."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.