Claims

Virtual and remote labs reduce the costs associated with conventional hands-on labs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Virtual and remote labs reduce the costs associated with conventional hands-on labs due to their required equipment, space, and maintenance staff. → Ruben Heradio 2016

Evidence

Ruben Heradio 2016

Ruben Heradio, Luis de la Torre, Daniel Galan, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Sebastian Dormido. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, Volume 98, Pages 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010

q1 · i? · review · r2

The review's abstract states this cost-reduction claim as motivation for the bibliometric analysis; the article offers it as a descriptive assertion, and the supplied text provides no measured cost comparison. The claim names equipment, space, and maintenance staff as cost drivers.

"Virtual and remote labs reduce the costs associated with conventional hands-on labs due to their required equipment, space, and maintenance staff."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id virtual-remote-labs-reduce-hands-on-lab-costs
title Virtual and remote labs reduce the costs associated with conventional hands-on labs
description Virtual and remote labs reduce the costs associated with conventional hands-on labs
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ruben-heradio-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.