Claims

Of the so-called reading tests used, Thorndike's Visual Vocabulary is the best measure of reading ability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among the so-called reading tests administered, Thorndike's Visual Vocabulary ranked best against both criteria, while Monroe's Rate of Silent Reading showed almost no correlation. → Wyman 1921

Evidence

Wyman 1921

Wyman, J. B., & Wendle, M. (1921). What is Reading Ability? The Journal of Educational Psychology, 518-531. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=%22What+is+Reading+Ability%22

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Grade VIII reading study conclusion: Visual Vocabulary correlated +0.62 ± 0.07 with Reading Ability T and 0.76 with Reading Ability C, the highest of the so-called reading tests under both criteria. These are raw correlations with probable errors, so no standardised magnitude is coded.

"Of the so-called Reading tests used, the best of them as a test of reading ability is Thorndike's Visual Vocabulary, while Monroe's Rate of Silent Reading test shows almost no correlation with our criteria for reading ability."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id visual-vocabulary-best-of-reading-tests
title Of the so-called reading tests used, Thorndike's Visual Vocabulary is the best measure of reading ability
description Of the so-called reading tests used, Thorndike's Visual Vocabulary is the best measure of reading ability
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wyman-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.