Claims

Vocabulary development interventions have a large average positive effect on cognitive vocabulary outcomes (g = 1.179) compared with traditional teaching methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Under the random effects model, vocabulary development interventions show a statistically significant average effect of g = 1.179 (95% CI [0.985, 1.374]) on vocabulary-related cognitive outcomes, greater than traditional word teaching methods. → Kansızoğlu 2025

Evidence

Kansızoğlu 2025

Kansızoğlu, N. & Bekiroğlu, N. (2025). The effect of vocabulary development interventions on cognitive outcomes of vocabulary: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202532083

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 43 Turkish theses (outliers excluded) using Hedge's g in CMA V3; random effects model. The article reports the average effect as "substantial (g = 1.179, 95% CI [0.985, 1.374], p < .05)"; fixed effects gave g = 0.964.

"the average effect of interventions aimed at improving vocabulary on vocabulary outcomes is substantial (g = 1.179, 95% CI [0.985, 1.374], p < .05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.