Claims

Computer-based teaching has a large, positive, significant effect on students' academic success compared with traditional teaching methods in Turkish studies from 2006-2014

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 78 pretest-posttest control-group studies, the random effects model yielded a mean effect size of ES = 1.13 (95% CI .97-1.29), which is large by Cohen's classification. → Veli Batdı 2015

Evidence

Veli Batdı 2015

Veli Batdı. (2015). A Meta-Analytic Study Concerning the Effect of Computer-Based Teaching on Academic Success in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2491

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 78 studies (experimental group 2,648 students, control group 2,636) using Hedges' d and a random effects model in CMA and MetaWin. The article reports the effect size was large according to Cohen's (1992) classification, so "using CBT had a positive effect on academic success."

"Based on the analyses of the 78 studies included in the meta-analytic review, the standard error was .08 and the upper limit for 95% of the confidence interval was 1.29, while the lower limit was .97 and the effect size was 1.13."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.