Both groups lost a statistically significant number of learnt words between the immediate post-test and the delayed test ten days later¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The control group's post-test mean of 17.61 fell to 16.21 on the delayed test (t = 4.16, df = 25, p < .05). → Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012
q3 i? The experimental group's post-test mean of 15.65 fell to 13.81 on the delayed test (t = 4.58, df = 27, p < .05). → Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012¶
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse. (2012). Interactive Digital Kitchen: The impact on Language learning. EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Proceedings. https://digitalinstitute.ncl.ac.uk/ilablearn/kitchen
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Paired sample t-test comparing post- and delayed-test results for the control group. The article reports "the participants have lost some of the words that they have learnt."
"For the comparison group, it is significant ( t = 4.16, df = 25, p < .05) with a post-test mean of 17.61 as compared to 16.21 for the delayed test."
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012 (2)¶
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse. (2012). Interactive Digital Kitchen: The impact on Language learning. EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Proceedings. https://digitalinstitute.ncl.ac.uk/ilablearn/kitchen
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Paired sample t-test comparing post- and delayed-test results for the experimental group. The article states "both groups changed to a statistically significant extent."
"The experimental group had significant results (t = 4.58, df = 27, p < .05), with a post-test mean of 15.65 and 13.81 for the delayed test."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to immediate post-test after the one-hour cooking session, including the control group not exposed to the Digital Kitchen — related
- On the delayed test ten days later, the control group's actual delayed score exceeded the experimental group's, although the authors conclude the experimental group acquired more lexical items — related
- Gains from an intensive period of second-language study persist for weeks without rehearsal. — reports the opposite
- Immediate task success does not establish learning that persists without AI support — a broader claim this one bears on
- Metalinguistic feedback's gains on wh-question performance decline over a ten-day delay while recast gains hold, leaving the two no different — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.