On the delayed test ten days later, the control group's actual delayed score exceeded the experimental group's, although the authors conclude the experimental group acquired more lexical items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? On delayed-minus-pre-test scores the experimental group mean was 6.54 and the control group mean was 8.82, a mean difference of 2.28 reported as statistically significant. → Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012
Evidence¶
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012¶
Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse. (2012). Interactive Digital Kitchen: The impact on Language learning. EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Proceedings. https://digitalinstitute.ncl.ac.uk/ilablearn/kitchen
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Between-group comparison of delayed-minus-pre-test scores in the same 54-learner experiment. The article prints control-group means higher on the delayed test while simultaneously concluding "the learners in the experimental group had acquired more lexical items than those in the control group."
"Table 3 reveals that the mean score of the experimental group was 6.54 and that of the control group was 8.82 on the actual delayed test scores. The mean difference was 2.28 with the p value .002"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to immediate post-test after the one-hour cooking session, including the control group not exposed to the Digital Kitchen — related
- In both high school and college groups, learners with negotiation of meaning scored higher on the delayed post-vocabulary test than learners with pre-modified input only — reports the opposite
- Both groups lost a statistically significant number of learnt words between the immediate post-test and the delayed test ten days later — related
- Intermediate EFL learners using the Digital Kitchen achieved significantly higher immediate post-test vocabulary gains than learners using a printed recipe in a normal kitchen — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.