Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to immediate post-test after the one-hour cooking session, including the control group not exposed to the Digital Kitchen¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The experimental group rose from a pre-test mean of 7.39 to a post-test mean of 17.6 (t = -24.02, df = 27, p < .05). → Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012 q3 i? The control group rose from a pre-test mean of 7.27 to a post-test mean of 15.65 (t = -16.58, df = 25, p < .05). → Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012 (2)

Evidence¶

Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012¶

Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse. (2012). Interactive Digital Kitchen: The impact on Language learning. EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Proceedings. https://digitalinstitute.ncl.ac.uk/ilablearn/kitchen

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group paired t-test on the experimental group's pre- and post-test scores in the one-hour cooking session. The article states "the difference in the students' performance after the intervention is highly significant."

"the mean score of the experimental group pre-test and post-test were 7.39 and 17.6 respectively, with a level of significance value of 0.00 (t = - 24.02, df = 27, p < .05)"

Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse 2012 (2)¶

Nor Fadzlinda Ishak and Paul Seedhouse. (2012). Interactive Digital Kitchen: The impact on Language learning. EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Proceedings. https://digitalinstitute.ncl.ac.uk/ilablearn/kitchen

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group paired t-test on the control group's scores. The article notes "the control group test scores also improved although they were not exposed to the Digital Kitchen."

"the mean score of the control group pre-test was 7.27 and of the post-test was at 15.65. In fact, the difference between the two means was also statistically significant ( t = - 16.58, df = 25, p < .05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Intermediate EFL learners using the Digital Kitchen achieved significantly higher immediate post-test vocabulary gains than learners using a printed recipe in a normal kitchen — related
• Both groups lost a statistically significant number of learnt words between the immediate post-test and the delayed test ten days later — related
• On the delayed test ten days later, the control group's actual delayed score exceeded the experimental group's, although the authors conclude the experimental group acquired more lexical items — related