Claims

VR assessments target three of the six ACGME core competencies: Patient Care, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, and Medical Knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The VR assessments targeted Patient Care (62%), Interpersonal and Communication Skills (50%), and Medical Knowledge (42%); Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, Professionalism, and Systems-based Practice were not assessed or not explicitly addressed. → Neher Andrea N. 2025

Evidence

Neher Andrea N. 2025

Neher Andrea N., Bühlmann Florian, Müller Martin, Berendonk Christoph, Sauter Thomas C., Birrenbach Tanja. (2025). Virtual reality for assessment in undergraduate nursing and medical education – a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06867-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Content analysis of the 26 included studies coded against the ACGME framework. The review reports that "The VR assessments targeted three of the six ACGME core competencies: Patient Care (62%), Interpersonal and Communication Skills (50%), and Medical Knowledge (42%)."

"The VR assessments targeted three of the six ACGME core competencies: Patient Care (62%), Interpersonal and Communication Skills (50%), and Medical Knowledge (42%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.