3D VR co-creators relied on lower-level knowledge co-construction strategies and never targeted the highest IAM strategy, while 2D co-creators quickly reached it¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? C5 (application of newly constructed meaning) was never the targeted strategy in 3D VR co-creation, whereas 2D digital co-creators moved quickly from C2 to C5 and never targeted C1. → Hsin-Yun Wang & Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun 2026

Evidence¶

Hsin-Yun Wang & Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun 2026¶

Hsin-Yun Wang & Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun. (2026). Understanding online knowledge communities via social networks and self-regulation in synchronous VR co-creation for distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Tech Research Dev, 74, 1037–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10588-0

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Two-mode SNA projecting participants onto the five Interaction Analysis Model strategies (Figs. 9–11, Table 3). The study reports 3D VR co-creators did not attempt C5 until week 3 while 2D co-creators employed it in week 2; no effect size was printed.

"It is noteworthy that C5, as the highest cognitive strategy, was never the targeted strategy used in 3D VR co-creation, suggesting the 3D VR co-creators' difficulty in dealing with knowledge co-construction and troubleshooting at the same time."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• 3D VR co-creation forms a more connected, centralized, and reciprocal aggregate social network with fewer cliques than 2D digital co-creation — related
• 3D VR co-creation showed CoI-like network features from the outset, with higher social-presence density and fewer, larger components than 2D — related